Once again, the world’s most storied democracy finds itself embroiled in the self-inflicted crisis of a government shutdown. What was once a constitutional curiosity has metastasized into predictable political theatre, a symbol not of principled disagreement but of systemic rot. Each shutdown delivers a fresh insult to United States institutions: vital services paused, workers unpaid, citizens consigned to uncertainty. The legislature, paralyzed by faction and grievance, abandons even the pretense of deliberation. This has become the new normal, an embarrassing spectacle for allies and adversaries alike.
Beneath the headlines a more fundamental and ominous transformation is occurring: the steady erosion of civil-military boundaries, culminating in this year’s unprecedented Quantico summit. No historian, no seasoned analyst can remember a moment when nearly a thousand US generals and admirals were summoned, not for strategic deliberation, but for public catechism. The President and his “War Secretary”, Pete Hegseth, administered an ideological litmus test—broadcast live for the nation to see—declaring war on “woke culture,” lambasting diversity, and prescribing masculine standards for fitness and appearance.
This was not an update on national security, nor a call for unity against foreign threats. Instead, it was a spectacle aimed at reconstituting the armed forces as an instrument of partisan will, a Praetorian corps ready for deployment in the United States’ own cities. The President's call for the military to train in urban areas—to “prepare for war” amid the ruins of Democratic strongholds—is a chilling invocation of domestic martial law. Hegseth’s overt attacks on “fat generals,” the explicit targeting of women and ethnic minorities in leadership positions, serve only to remind us how quickly the machinery of power can be weaponized against the core values of inclusivity and professionalism.
To grasp the peril of these developments is not to indulge in partisan hyperbole—it is to heed decades of expert warnings. As General James Mattis famously wrote, the health of civil-military relations is the first line of defense against authoritarianism. The US military’s greatness has never resided in political conformity or ideological purity. Its capacity to serve and protect has always depended on disciplined neutrality, a refusal to become the errand boy of any administration.
Shutdown politics and militarization, then, are two sides of the same coin—a republic increasingly governed by crisis, confrontation, and spectacle. Experts like Andrew Bacevich and Lawrence Tribe compare this moment not just to Washington’s darker days, but to the tragic decline of other democracies. Rome, Weimar, Chile: all went astray when militaries became tools of the executive, when civilian voices fell silent, when political disputes became literal battlegrounds.
FAFO—“Fuck Around and Find Out”—has become the new mantra, the crude lexicon of leaders for whom threats replace arguments and consequences are meted out not in the courts, but by the chain of command. This is governance by coercion, not by consensus—a retreat from reason in favor of raw power, a death spiral that endangers every principle on which the United States was founded.
What is at stake is nothing less than the survival of the US experiment. This is not just about budgets and bureaucracies, but about the meaning of public service, the sanctity of law, and the independence of institutions. When government regularly abrogates its most basic function—to assure continuity and stability—and when the military is conscripted for domestic political theater, the boundaries that shield liberty from tyranny begin to dissolve.
Who will speak for the Constitution, when soldiers are pressed to swear fealty to presidents and not principle? Who will hold the line for pluralism, when diversity itself is cast as a “weapon of weakness”? Who will honor the old wisdom: that the greatest threat to the republic comes not from foreign adversaries, but from the corrosion of its own values?
As the United States lurches into another shutdown and the sound of marching boots is heard in cues of political drama, the need for critical vigilance has never been greater. Allies abroad look on in dismay; citizens at home await reassurance that this republic remains alarmed, but not yet lost.
Expert voices urge us to remember: Democracies do not die in darkness—they die in plain sight, when self-inflicted chaos and the drumbeat of militarization are mistaken for renewal. The hour is late, but not yet terminal. To let the shutdown and the Quantico spectacle pass in silence would be an error worthy only of those who wish to “find out”—much too late—what was lost when no one cared enough to fight for it.
Kommentar schreiben